Forefront by TSMP: Initial Coin Offerings – Decrypting Digital Tokens

CLOSE

Directory

Thio Shen Yi, SC

Joint Managing Partner

Litigation

Stefanie Yuen Thio

Joint Managing Partner

Corporate

Derek Loh

Partner

Litigation

Jennifer Chia

Partner

Corporate

Melvin Chan

Partner

Litigation

Ian Lim

Partner

Litigation

June Ho

Partner

Corporate

Kelvin Koh

Partner

Litigation

Ong Pei Ching

Partner

Litigation

Mark Jacobsen

Partner

Corporate

Felicia Tan

Partner

Litigation

Mijung Kim

Partner

Litigation

Leon Lim

Partner

Corporate

Nanthini Vijayakumar

Partner

Litigation

Jeffrey Chan, SC

Senior Director

Litigation

Prof Tang Hang Wu, PhD

Consultant

Litigation

Prof Hans Tjio

Consultant

Corporate

Tania Chin

Director

Litigation

Raeza Ibrahim

Director

Litigation

Nicholas Ngo

Director

Litigation

Kevin Elbert

Director

Litigation

Vu Lan Nguyen

Director

Litigation

Stephanie Chew

Director

Litigation

Benjamin Bala

Associate Director

Litigation

Ernest Low

Associate Director

Corporate

Brenda Chow

Associate Director

Corporate

Heather Chong

Associate Director

Corporate

Nicole Lee

Associate Director

Corporate

Joshua Phang Shih Ern

Associate Director

Litigation

Tay Quan Li

Senior Associate

Litigation

Lyn Toh Leng

Senior Associate

Corporate

Angela Chai Rui Min

Senior Associate

Litigation

Arthur Chin Yen Bing

Senior Associate

Litigation

Chow Jian Hui

Senior Associate

Corporate

Claudia Hui Ru Jun

Senior Associate

Corporation

R. Arvindren

Senior Associate

Litigation

Chia Wan Lu

Senior Associate

Litigation

Lau Tin Yi

Senior Associate

Corporate

Phoon Wuei

Senior Associate

Litigation

Terence Yeo

Senior Associate

Litigation

Juliana Lake

Senior Associate

Litigation

Sabrina Lim Su Ping

Senior Associate

Corporate

Kashib Shareef bin Ahmad Hussain

Senior Associate

Corporate

Sherlyn Lim Li Xuan

Senior Associate

Litigation

Kimberly Ng

Associate

Litigation

Vanessa Cheong Shu Qi

Associate

Corporate

Ryan Yap Cheah Jin

Associate

Litigation

Ang Kai Le

Associate

Litigation

Glenn Ng Qiheng

Associate

Litigation

Isaac Tay Zhuo Yan

Associate

Litigation

Markus Low Yu Wen

Associate

Corporate

Stasia Ong Pei Qi

Associate

Litigation

Sarah Kim Mun Jeong

Associate

Litigation

Yang Hai Kun

Associate

Corporate

Nicole Sim

Associate

Litigation

Ryan Ang

Associate

Corporate

Pearlie Peh

Associate

Litigation

Arvind Soundararajan

Associate

Corporate

Perl Choo

Associate

Litigation

Forefront by TSMP

21 August 2017

Initial Coin Offerings – Decrypting Digital Tokens

By Stefanie Yuen Thio, Nadia Ahmad Samdin

Cover photo credit: istockphoto.com

Behold, Blockchain

What do DarkCoin, virtual islands and an unhackable digital ledger have in common, other than sounding like the plot of the next Marvel movie? They are the subject matter of the latest investment craze threatening to storm traditional capital markets. Welcome to the disruptive world of blockchain, where Bitcoin (brainchild of unknown creator(s) under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto) is the new currency and Geek-speak the new lingua franca.

Bitcoin and Blockchain Broken Down

Bitcoin is a virtual currency created on the internet. Like paper money, it has no intrinsic value. You can buy (cyberworld) Bitcoin using (real world) cash, and deposit it in a virtual wallet.

Bitcoin was first used principally for online payments. The anonymity associated with the cryptocurrency made it a natural choice for sensitive payments (donations to Wikileaks) and criminal transactions (buying illegal drugs on the Darknet).

Today Bitcoin is increasingly used in the world of bricks and mortar. Overstock, the international retailer, accepts Bitcoin. According to the Luno wallet application, Bitcoin is accepted in at least 30 merchants in Singapore.

Blockchain is the technology that Bitcoin is based on. Blockchain technology has revolutionised online payments and transactions because it is seen as a decentralised and more secure form of maintaining a digital ledger of electronic transactions.

From Cyberspace To Capital Market – Crossing The Rubicoin

Digital currency and blockchain are no longer confined to the online domain. Businesses have recently launched offerings of bitcoin-based digital tokens called Initial Coin Offerings (ICO) to the investing public. With a reported US$1.3 billion raised in the first 7 months of 2017 alone, and some offerings successfully funded in record time (Brave’s ICO raised US$35 million in less than a minute), there has been growing investor interest.

This has prompted regulatory scrutiny from the Securities and Exchange Commission in the US and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).

The issue is this: What is the exact nature of digital tokens? If they are cryptocurrency or donations-based crowdfunding, they are not currently regulated. However, if they are debt instruments or give returns based on underlying investments, then they may fall within the ambit of regulated securities.

Are digital tokens cryptocurrency?

Just because digital tokens, like Bitcoin and Ether (another virtual currency), are based on blockchain technology, does not make them a cryptocurrency.

Are ICOs a form of crowdfunding?

ICOs have been characterised as “crowdfunding” which, in its purest form, is not regulated. Kickstarter is the best known example of a crowdfunding platform, where creators raise financial support for their projects. Backers were rewarded in products or services – from an autographed copy of the graphic novel they financed, to dinner with the author. Backers’ contributions are more akin to donations or (product) purchases because they do not get returns from the project. This is not regulated. However, the MAS has also clarified that crowdfunding that is securities-based is subject to regulation.

Are ICOs securities offerings?

Some of the ICOs currently in the news have elements of securities offerings.

In Singapore, any offering of shares, debt instruments like bonds, business trusts and collective investment schemes (CIS) such as REITs, would attract prospectus requirements. CIS are defined broadly to include investments where investors’ funds are pooled and managed, with investors getting a return based on fund performance.[1] Accordingly, if the digital token confers similar rights, then it is in essence a security.

Adding to the confusion is the fact that ICOs are deceptively like IPOs (down to the rhyming abbreviation). The offering is accompanied by a White Paper containing information about the ICO, but these vary drastically in detail and clarity, and are often more manifesto than offering memorandum, giving investors scant information. The lack of (capital) market standard offering documents makes it hard to fathom the nature and risks of such investments. Take some examples:

Some ICOs appear to offer in-platform rewards:

  • OpusFounded in Poland and China, this is a music sharing platform, like Spotify. In July 2017, Opus launched an ICO, offering tokens called OPTs which can be used to purchase songs and other music content from the platform.
  • DecentralandThis is a virtual reality platform in development phase. Holders can use the digital tokens to buy virtual real estate. This appears to be essentially a pre-paid in-game purchase to be used within the platform when it is launched. However, this is extrapolation only, as the White Paper was inscrutable. As an illustration, consider this paragraph, intended as a Summary (and presumably to help investors understand the ICO): “Decentraland is a distributed platform for a shared virtual world that enables developers to build and monetize applications on top of it. The scarcity of land, on top of which applications can be built, creates hubs that capture user attention, which drives revenue to content creators. MANA tokens will be used to purchase land, goods, and services in-world. MANA tokens will also be used to incentivize content creation and user adoption, therefore bootstrapping the first decentralized virtual world.”

Some ICOs appear to offer rewards linked to investments (but whether these are securities would depend on the rights attached to tokens):

  • Cross CoinThe proceeds from the sale of the Starta digital token will be used to invest in the Starta Accelerator, a basket of startups “with Eastern European R&D roots”. The White Paper states that “Tokens will be issued as a type of debt”, and “Cross Coin will receive a profit share from the Starta Accelerator and undertakes to utilise it to buy back the tokens”.
  • FundPlaces Pte LtdThis Singapore-based company is a “proptech” company: an “online platform where users can discover, research and invest in global real estate opportunities, starting from as low as S$1,000”. It claims to provide “execution-only Services”, without advising “on the merits of any particular transactions”. Users register with the platform to view potential real estate deals that would be paid for in TILES (its digital token) which, as its website proclaims, entitles holders “to all the economic benefits (after fees and expenses) of the underlying asset that each unique TILE references.”
  • TenXTenX is a Singapore-based cryptocurrency payment platform provider whose tagline is “Making Cryptocurrencies Spendable Anytime Anywhere”. On 24 June 2017, it launched an ICO and raised US$80m in under 10 minutes, with the proceeds being used to develop the business of TenX. Based on its White Paper, holders of the “PAY tokens will receive 0.5% of the aggregate payment volume that is spent by all users with the TenX Card on a monthly basis”.

Investing in FOMO

No, FOMO is not another ICO. It is Millenial-speak for “Fear of Missing Out”.

Investors may feel that they have missed the Bitcoin rush and see ICOs as a chance to jump on the blockchain bandwagon. Bitcoin has increased in value by more than 1,600% in the past 2 years. But notwithstanding the new nomenclature, investors should ask the same fundamental questions: How strong is the underlying business and the management team? What are the risks? What returns do I get? In the case of many ICOs, the lack of a prospectus makes an effective evaluation by potential investors challenging.

Until investors are able to read offering documents without saying “It’s all Geek to me”, we suggest an investment philosophy based not on FOMO but rather, one we have coined DUMBAS: Don’t Understand Much? Better Ask Somebody.

[1] The Securities and Futures Act is expected to be amended to broaden the ambit of CIS to capture investors’ monies which are either pooled or managed (not necessarily both).